Authors

Jeremy
Gregg
Ethan
    follow me on Twitter

    Archive of Posts

    Creators

    Thoughts on Miami, Future

    Okay, now that everyone’s had 24 hours to digest the awesomeness that was the Terps’ beatdown of Miami last night. Everyone’s had their chance to brag to their friends that the Terps are on top of the ACC, and have in no way left any doubt that they’re better than BC, NC State and Miami. I’m psyched, I’m pumped, I’m jacked, I’m hyped. It’s a great feeling, and a new one for me since my Terp fandom is young.

    Let’s put this all in perspective for a minute here. We have clobbered the doldrums of the ACC. Miami’s so bad that BC beat them twice. BC’s so bad that they lost to Maine and a few other mid-majors in non-conference play. NC State’s so bad…well they have one great, two good, and 9 mediocre-at-best players. I don’t mean to belittle the wins in any way, mostly because there have been bad teams in the ACC before and we haven’t beaten them like this since ’03, but to me, conference play begins now.

    We have road games at Clemson and Florida State coming up. I’ve heard a lot of talk about how hungry Clemson’s going to be because they lost to BC. That’s garbage. This is the ACC. Maryland’s number one in the conference. They’re at home. If they weren’t as hungry as possible already, Oliver Purnell isn’t doing his job. They have Trevor Booker, and we have Maryland’s best defensive big man in years, and he’s a freshman. Oh, and we also have a rotation filled with guys who can drop double digits (save Dino Gregory) on any given night.

    I’m getting ahead of myself now, back to the Miami game. I’m going to go all Jeremy here and list my most important stories of the game. I’m going to one-up my co-blogger, though, and list my five key developments from last nights thrashing:

    Landon Milbourne: Holy cow. Where has this guy been for 3 and a half years? I knew he was talented and a good shooter, but his big problem was inconsistency and wearing down. Not this year. He’s just getting better and better. He’s shooting 21-30 in his last three games (a ridiculous .700 clip), and is giving defenders nightmares. He’s consistently matched up against bigger and slower guys, giving him open looks from midrange out to three-point land, and he just flat-out isn’t missing.

    What’s most impressive to me is when you further break down his incredible shooting percentage. First of all, he’s fifth in the ACC in field goal percentage on the year, second in ACC play (behind Trevor Booker). Sean Mosley doesn’t have enough attempts to qualify, but he’d be higher still. However, Landon’s 6’7” and he’s playing against guys who are 2-3 inches taller than he is. That means his layups are more difficult than their layups, which makes his shooting percentage more impressive. Then when you consider how many jumpers and three-pointers he takes? That’s truly incredible.

    Against Miami, he was deadly. They left him a bit of room; he’d knock down a jumper. He stepped back and hit a three, he grabbed offensive rebounds and got easy putbacks. He kicked out when he didn’t have it and set screens for Greivis. It was just an all-around studly performance from arguably the hardest worker on the team (according to Mosley).

    Greivis Vasquez: Another blowout, another shimmy. He’s getting better at them too, more rhythmic, less spasmic, and his most recent version against the Hurricanes was right in front of, and directed at, the Hurricane bench. Not sure I’m okay with that, but no one was yelling at him from there and they didn’t seem too upset (about the shimmy, anyway. They look depressed all game long).

    Greivis had nine assists to only two turnovers in this one. That’s the fourth straight game for our fearless leader with only two TOs. Think he’s playing a little smarter? The incredible thing is, despite his not forcing things, he’s still making absolutely insane passes. Not insane in the lack-of-sanity way, but in the “how did he just put that ball there?” way. Gary’s offense works so well because he finds cutters everywhere on the court from everywhere on the court. Sometimes I think “how on earth did he see that cutter?” Truly astounding, and he was at his best against Miami, dominating smaller guards as is his forte.

    Jordan Williams: I’ve said this before, and I’m not making an exact comparison, more a remark about the similarity, but Williams looks like Tim Duncan on defense. High praise, and he’s not that good (not even close), but the way he seems to control literally the entire paint when he’s in the ballgame is jaw dropping.

    There were a couple of possessions where he stepped out to stop a guard from slashing to the basket, then when the guard dished it to the big man, Williams would slide over and contest the shot and force a miss. Then he’d grab the rebound, and make an outlet pass to start a break. That happened at least three times, and happened even more against NC State. Gary mentioned in the postgame how he really helped Landon offensively, but Maryland hasn’t only won the points in the paint battles the last few games, they’ve dominated them. In the last four games, they’ve scored 180 points in the paint. The bad guys? 76.

    That’s the kind of defense this kid who can’t drink, can’t gamble and can’t rent a car is bringing to the table. Think of how good he’ll be when he puts in summer work with the Maryland strength coaches and learns the game a little better instead of on-the-fly, as Gary would say, this year. Scary, exciting stuff.

    Hustle: Okay, a trademark of great Maryland teams is hustle. But for the last two games guys have been diving all over the floor for loose balls and forcing turnovers – multiple guys on the same play. Greivis did it, Mosley did it, Bowie did it, Dino did it. Not only did these plays really hype up the crowd, but also they forced the other teams to burn timeouts, and beget more plays just like it. It’s great watching players do this, it’s a coach’s dream, and it’s what every fan wants to see. These guys eat, sleep, and breathe basketball, and it’s really showing on the court.

    Consistency: This has been a big-time buzzword for Maryland teams in the Vasquez era. So many times we’ve watched as the Terps pull a big upset, only to witness a puzzling loss soon after. Since William & Mary, that hasn’t happened. There haven’t even been those long stretches of stagnant offense where the other team gets back in it. The team has kept the pedal to the floor for 40 minutes since ACC play started. It’s great to see, and I hope we see more of it.

    Obviously, this all starts with Vasquez. Other than for five minutes against Wake, he’s been leading the consistency charge (I think that’s an oxymoron, but I like it, so it stays). He hasn’t been making silly plays, shimmying aside, he hasn’t been selfish, he hasn’t been careless and he’s working his tail off and using his length on defense.

    He’s been consistent, and Hayes is Hayes because Hayes is consistent (and calm). Milbourne’s been, as previously mentioned, ridiculous, but also consistent: double-digit points in nine straight games. Williams has been the one thing that no one ever expects from a freshman, which is consistent. Mosley has consistently played well on D and grabbed rebounds (3rd on the team in boards by the way, over 5 a game). What more can you ask for when your starting five just doesn’t take games off ever?

    There’s a lot to be excited about. If we go down to Clemson Sunday and play the same game we played against Miami, we’ll win, and it will look easy. In fact, the games against Miami and NC State we played were so good, that if repeated, I’d guarantee we wouldn’t lose to anyone in this conference, including that team in Durham. That’s how well we’ve been playing, and that’s how well we need to keep playing to keep our top spot.

    • Will
      The SVP segments were finally posted: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htuc7qswhJI
    • mightyterps
      hey guys i mentioned earlier. i love our 5 guard offense. we have 3 strong ball handlers. gv as a near super as a slasher/scorer/passer. the menace sm. doing it all. and our pure shooter and best passer and mr. calm eh. and two backups another strong ball handler and slasher in ab and maybe our most athletic scorer/shooter ct.if these guys can cover maybe our rebound problem, we are going strong.
    • Ricksterps
      Wheels, without looking it up I believe Straw and both boys beat them towards the end of their big push towards the NCAA. So I would say GV, Hayes and LM are the only ones to win down there.

      I may have missed one.
    • Clemson will have to beat Maryland. The Terps won't beat themselves. I don't know if we will win, but as a fan, that's all you can ask for. The Wake loss changed this team for the rest of the season. I truly believe this
    • chiterp
      So if we lose on sunday, we will basically tie with Duke for 1st...and if we win, we remain 1st.

      Great night 2 be a Terp...plus our RPI is now 47.

      I guarantee that we go at least, 1-1 between the Clemson game and the FSU game. Mark the tape....
    • Mike
      And Wake lost to GTech tonight. All putting distance between the higher team and us.

      All putting more distance between us and the higher team in the ACC standings in each of the two games.
    • Mike
      UVA lost to Hokies in OT at home tonight.
    • DiamondbackRuss
      Damn, I was hoping that somehow someway both teams would lose :)
    • GERRY
      Breaking News - This may not be the perfect storm forming but, seriously, who would have thought we'd be looking at this ...now?

      MD - 4-1
      Duke 5-2
      VA 3-2 (Lost to VT tonight)
      WF 4-3 (Lost to GT tonight)
      GT 4-3
      VT 3-3
      NC 2-3
      Clem 3-4
      BC 3-4
      NCS 2-5
      MIA 1-5

      When your butt is at the top of the flag pole, everyone's going to shoot at you.
      WF lost by 20 and VA lost by one but were ahead by 1 with 11 sec to go. Now they
      know how we feel.

      Clemson is a BIG game. We can make BIG statement.



    • chiterp
      Oh oh....VT went to UVA....were down like 15 with 10 minutes to go...and went on to beat UVA in OT.

      Gotta luv the ACC...also gotta luv the fact that this puts us solidly in 1st place, at least, till sunday.
    • PT
      I say forget about who we've beaten so far. MD is at 4-1 in conference! When is the last time they had such a solid start? The last few years they've put themselves in a hole early and had to claw their way out. That takes a toll on a team for sure. It's simply a great sign they are playing well now, putting conference wins on the board. Obviously, we can't expect them to continue winning games by 20+ but imagine how we'd feel if they were 2-3.
    • gbx79
      Will stitt be at full strength by Sunday? Booker plays better when Stitt's on the floor.
    • JohnE
      Good post Ethan! You echoed what I saw watching the NCST in person. Key against Clemson will be team defense. We should score and Clemson should score, but we don't want to get in a run & gun situation where their atleticism takes over. I agree with Wheels, the kittycats weakness is between their ears. Tough team D, contest every shot, and minimize their second shot opportunities. We can walk out of there with a W. Carpe diem Terps! JWB! Seniors step up on the road.
    • Wheels
      The big difference between Booker and guys like Alabi or Smith is that Booker has range. He's about the same size as Smith, but he is way more athletic and can shoot 12 feet and out. I think Booker is the best player in the ACC. Other teams don't have to gameplan to stop Shyerface. Some teams gameplan to stop Greivis, but not like everyone gameplans to stop Booker. I've even seen games where he puts the ball on the floor.

      This game will really test the Terps mentally. Littlejohn is a tough place to play, and Clemson is UBER athletic. I can't remember the last time MD played well down there (maybe someone can look it up to make me look bad). This is the type of game that could be like the Dook game last year. A win at Clemson would be massive.

      I disagree with Rick on not pressing Clemson. Clemson's guards are their weak link. They will turn the ball over a ton. I get what you're saying, Rick, about not letting Clemson get cheap points (and ridiculous dunks) to get the crowd even more on fire; but I think MD's been so successful at turning over average guards. Press and get back. Change up the D a bit. Make Clemson have to think about what MD is doing.

      We all know that Clemson's weakness is between their ears. I wonder if Oliver Purnell is a slightly better version of Sidney Lowe.

      As a side note, if anyone saw PTI this afternoon, Myron Rolle was on. I'm rooting for that kid. It's too bad he went to FSU. But what a good kid. I'll root for him everyday of the week over a guy like Tim Tebow. Vainglorious doesn't even begin describe Tebow, and for an ultra Christian like Tebow, I can't believe he hasn't subdued that massive ego yet. Giving thanks to God during each interview shouldn't count as much as living a humble life given such innate talents. Makes me think Tebow needs to read up on the 7 Deadly Sins to see about the sin of pride. Sorry for the rant.
    • eddienj
      Amen brother. Keep bringing the truth.
    • DiamondbackRuss
      Bummer, according to several reports, former Terps B-ball coach (Gary's coach) Bud Milikan died.

      Former AD Jim Kehoe died a few weeks ago.

      Sad day for Terps
    • Jacob
      The blog article in the Post had tons of great things to say about Bud by guys who played for him. Unfortunately it was so long ago that I'm not sure if anyone who regularly talks on the SOUP would have had the opportunity to watch the guy coach. The POST article credited him with bringing Basketball to Maryland, and Maryland to basketball as it were.
      Apparently Bud learned basketball from Henry Iba, who taught the likes of Rupp, Wodden, Knight, Gillispie. Guess who Gary Williams played for and and was thus influenced by: Coach Millikan. How crazy is it that our very own coach has less than 3 degrees of freedom from some of the all time greats?!
    • Mike
      Class of 1967.
    • eddienj
      I'm not old enough to have seen Bud coach but I guess he's the godfather of Maryland basketball. I'm sure Gary was influenced by him greatly since he played for him in his formative years. But Gary actually belongs to Dr. Tom Davis' family tree of coaching. I think he would honestly tell you Dr. Davis was his biggest influence as a coach.
    • Harry
      Dookie V predicted minimum of 6 ACC teams get in during last nights FSU / Duke lovefest on ESPN.
      He did say UM first. The other teams were DK, NC, GT, WK, CL and said probably FSU as well.
      Now for my grain of salt.
    • Mike
      Ever notice that the people that know the most about the game respect Gary the most?
    • okaybowler
      So Doug Gottlieb know less than nothing about basketball?
    • eddienj
      I noticed that also. Post-game press conferences tell the tale. You will rarely have an opposing coach not mention "well-coached team" after the game. It's actualy astounding how almost every opposing coach mentions it. I'd say about 90% of the time, if not more.
    • NYMets9631
      From Jay Bilas at ESPN on 6 coaches who deserve recognition ---

      Gary Williams, Maryland: How is it that Williams takes so much heat? He has been the most competitive guy against Duke and North Carolina that the ACC has seen, and this season, Williams has the Terps right at the top of the league. He has good guards and has developed his young big guys. Maryland has a top-10 offense and the identity of a blue-collar team that looks out for each other. When many teams are struggling to find an identity, the Terps have one under Williams. He has done another great job.
    • cjazh
      All good stuff ... need to double-team Booker in the post like we did Alabi (Fl State) and Smith (NC State) ... we did that very well on those guys, although Booker is better than those guys. Keep JW out of foul-trouble, we need his big body on Booker ...

      Just one other note .... T-Ross its not too late .... come join the party!
    • Will
      I really like our chances in this game for exactly this reason. Same double-team strategy we've been playing for the past several games. Force Clemson to beat us from outside. We have the 6th best 2-PT field goal percentage defense in the country. As noted above, our defense in the paint is incredible. We should also be able to handle the press fairly easily. Clemson does turn the ball over, so that's in our favor.

      We will need to really perfect our defense if we're going to beat Kansas in the finals. Seriously.
    • that last sentence slayed me. if we win these two road games, i am right there with you.
    • okaybowler
      Ethan good write up. Look, we all know that there is a lot of parity in the ACC this year, but the fact is we've beaten three out of the bottom four in the conference. Now it's time to prove ourselves against the bigger boys (although Clemson sits at #8 at 3-4). A good Clemson squad has had a way of folding down the stretch the past two years, and I'm not sure that this team is better than those teams (they went 19-0 one year, right?).

      I agree with Ricksterps about winning close games. We've played like monsters these last few games, but our opponents did not play well. Even if we come out swinging, we're eventually going to come out against a team that will hit us back, and we'll need to prove we're tougher. That Wake game was almost that game, but we all knew it would be a tough one on the road with just one day of rest. Imagine if we'd taken that, we could be 5-0. But maybe we needed to lose to play the way we've been playing.

      Go Terps!

    • jonbruns
      Dont you think that a part of how bad these past few teams have looked can be credited to the Terps? I mean the Terps MADE them play bad. NCSt didn't seem that bad beating Duke.
    • Jacob
      Florida State also looked alright playing in Durham last night. They were down 4 with the ball at one point. The last five minutes of the game, Duke got some stops but the end score doesn't show how hard Fla St. worked and how well they played in the game. Fla. St. is going to continue to be good when we meet them at home.
    • okaybowler
      No I agree. I'm just saying that there are two responses against a team playing well: Step up or fold. Not every team we play that hot against will fold like NCst and THE u.
    • jonbruns
      Everyone is mentioning the quality of the teams we have beaten in the ACC thus far. But to be fair, the thing that thrills me is the WAY we are beating these so-called mediocre ACC teams (Although Duke, FSU and GT wouldn't call them mediocre). The Terps have honestly been putting on a clinic thus far. The lone loss was really one we let slip away. I would say Wake stole it from us.
    • ravdave
      Great post Ethan,

      But I would add one more highlight. Team Defense! In your face, smothering, smart, no passing lane open team defense. Its been years since I've seen whistle to whistle defense this good from a Maryland team. So to add to your conclusions, if we play the kind of defense that we've seen in these early ACC contests, I agree that we will earn more ACC wins than many of us thought possible just a couple weeks ago.






    • tommyg4
      Our team defense has been much improved. In Maui, the team seemed to be mechanical on defense, as if they were simply going through the motions. Now they're extending the perimeter and picking up the pressure, making opponents uncomfortable at all times. If they keep this defense up, they can lock down the likes of Trevor Booker and Jon Scheyer.
    • Ricksterps
      Good write-up Ethan. The only issue I would have is when you dissected who we had beat in the ACC you forgot about FSU. Yea, State, BC and Miami are at the bottom but FSU has been in the top 25 most of the year. It is our only good win of the season so far. Don't take it away!

      Clemson is a different animal than we have played so far. They play a lot like we do. They will press and try to get points from their defense. I think it's a mistake to press them. It let's them off the hook and gives them easy baskets if they break it. Make them score in their half court offense.

      One thing we haven't proven is winning close games. We are 0-1 in that department thus far. Hey, I'm fine with blowing people out. And we have done a great job of playing with a lead. But you aren't going to do that to every team. We need to win a close game.

      The Wake game was not played well at crunch time. Let's hope they have learned from that and matured as a team.
    • chiterp
      We need to win a close game? We need to try to win every game. I would rather blow out teams than keep the game close.

      We keep saying that we beat the bottom of the barrel, but I am sure Duke will tell you that NC State is not a 'bottom of the barrel' team. Boston College beat Clemson. Miami beat FSU. We beat FSU by 9 and some still consider FSU a tournament team.

      I happen to think that close games can become anyone's game. The trick is trying to not keep it close. That way, we don't find ourselves blaming refs for losing games.
    • Ricksterps
      I disagree. Winning close games isn't just a matter of luck. It's a matter of composer and confidence. We didn't show that down in Wake. We didn't run our offense, we just ran down and threw up some shots.

      Obviously I was not advocating playing poorly to get into a close game. The reality is we are going to have close games. We aren't going to keep blowing everyone out of the water.

    • chiterp
      Say Md was playing Duke. Scores are 81-80. MD has the lead. 5 seconds to go. Scheyer has the ball...he drives to the basket on an attempt to score and Scheyer draws contact.

      Trust me, the decision of the official to call a foul or not can determine the outcome of that game. If he calls a foul and Scheyer makes 2 shots, Duke wins. If he does not call the foul, MD wins.

      If you watch B-Ball like me, you know that this kinda shit happens all the time.

      It's called luck, my friend...because it turns on what the ref calls...and we know they don't call some fouls and they call some flimsy fouls....and that is no bullshit.

      The truth is this; close games can be won by any team. Just depends on how the ref is feeling. Believing otherwise is certainly an interesting perspective.
    • Ricksterps
      It's not just about the last five seconds. It's about the last three or four minutes of a game. To say close games are just determined by luck is very naive. We didn't lose the Wake game because they got lucky. We didn't perform well in the last few minutes of regulation and OT.

      To infer that the refs decide the outcome of close games it to give yourself a built-in excuse to lose.

    • NYMets9631
      I was just wondering who you guys thought we should have match up with Booker. I was thinking maybe start out with Landon on him and then have J-Will guard that Jerai Grant kid who is pretty long and lanky. Then we comes out of the game usually for Noel Johnson, Devin Booker or Milton Jennings, have Landon slide over to guard one of them and match J-Will up with Booker. What do you guys think we should do?
    • nmprisons
      J. Will. on Booker the whole time he is in, unless he just can't handle it. I see real foul problems for Landon if he is asked to guard Booker.
    • chiterp
      I totally agree with you Jer...I was just thinking that by the time I get to watch the game, the weekend will be over.

      It's interesting that Landon played 77 minutes during his freshman year. Hell, Pearman might get that much minutes this year. I think that Landon is coming into his own because we have a big man who occupies the paint (as opposed to Dave Neal who liked to extend the other team's D by heading close to the 3 point line, but then left Landon alone under the basket with 2 dudes, at 6ft 9 just fucking his shit up).

      I am so happy for Landon...I remember the dunk he had against Florida State when he was a sophomore...he scored 18 points that day; was the player of the game; his mum was at the game and I remember thinking that perhaps his mum should come more to the games for inspiration.....aahhh...good times.

      I will like the National Press to take note of this dude for real. As for Mosley, I think he can play in the NBA someday. I basically see him as a taller less experienced Nate Robinson. He is certainly gonna be All ACC next year.

      I also see that J-Dub is gonna lead this team sumday if he sticks around. Probably after Sean leaves. He helps us so much, I love it. He is certainly a top 5 freshman in the ACC. He will make the All ACC freshman team in March.

      It looks like our starters for next year are Dino, J-Dub, Mosley, Tucker & Bowie. If that's the case, i'm gonna need Dino to step up he offensive game seriously. Tucker & Bowie can do it; it's just that we have better O power right now in Hayes & Vasquez....I think they will be fine.

      Let me just enjoy this season and thinkk of the next one around July. Go Terps. It's such a long way to sunday.
    • Ironically, even though I've been touting Milbourne all year (not to toot my own horn, but...toot toot), everyone is talking about him after Miami. And by everyone, I mean the Maryland media. I think he's a potential NBA player, and I even wrote up a blog post called "The Legacy of Landon Milbourne" when trying to get on the site, which I have yet to publish because I have yet to edit it with his recent developments of awesomeness. He deserves all the praise, not only because of his talent and performance, but because he's a leader and everyone I've talked to on the team say he works the hardest of all of them and sets the tone for the entire team. This year, that tone's pretty good.
    • NYMets9631
      haha feel the same way. I'd rather play Saturday
    • I hate that the Clemson game is on Sunday night. I feel like I can't wait for the weekend to be over so I can watch the game. That sucks. I want to enjoy my weekends. Instead, I'm giddy for Sunday night. Thanks FOX.
    • Gregg
      Fox is the best!!!
    blog comments powered by Disqus